── Writing · 5 min read

Three-route channel architecture, written down

Services GTM into a concentrated buyer segment, in one diagram.

When the total addressable buyer set is small and identifiable, channel strategy stops being a mix question and becomes a routing question. Three routes, each with a different job, each measured differently.

Route one - demand capture

For buyers already in motion. Search, answer engines, marketplaces, partner referral. Job: be present and credible at the moment of active evaluation. Measured on qualified conversation rate, not volume.

Route two - demand creation

For buyers with the problem but no active project. Point-of-view content, events, founder-led distribution. Job: change what they believe is possible or urgent. Measured on engaged-account growth and self-reported source, never on last-click.

Route three - named-account pressure

For the specific list you have decided you want. Direct outreach carrying real context, targeted assets, warm paths. Job: earn one conversation per account. Measured on account coverage and meeting quality.

Why separating them matters

  • 01Each route has a different time-to-signal. Blending them into one dashboard makes the slow one look broken.
  • 02Budget arguments get resolvable: you are trading between named jobs, not between tactics.
  • 03Content gets a clear brief - which route is this piece for?
Most 'our marketing is not working' conversations are actually one route doing three jobs badly.
Also posted on LinkedIn